Compare / Amp vs Lindy
Head-to-head
Amp vs Lindy.
Side-by-side on ratings, pricing, pros, cons, and the honest take on which to pick. Cross-category comparison: Amp is a coding agent and Lindy is a no-code saas.
| Amp | Lindy | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.0 / 5 | 4.5 / 5 |
| Category | Coding Agent | No-code SaaS |
| Tech level | developer | no code |
| Open source | No | No |
| Pricing | Free tier with usage limits. Paid tiers via Sourcegraph subscription. Bundled with Sourcegraph Code Search for teams already on the platform. | Freemium. Paid plans from ~$49/month. |
| Best for | Engineering teams already paying for Sourcegraph Code Search who want to add an AI agent that reuses the existing codebase index. Free tier is generous enough for individual evaluation. | Sales and customer support teams at B2B companies who need working agents in days, not weeks, with no developer on staff. |
| Not for | Teams not on Sourcegraph — the standalone story is less differentiated than Claude Code or Augment. Builders who want a simpler CLI experience. | Teams with complex custom integrations, regulated data, or who need full infrastructure control. |
Our verdict on Amp
Sourcegraph's agentic coding tool built on years of code-search investment. Strong for teams already on Sourcegraph; less compelling as a standalone.
Full Amp review →Our verdict on Lindy
The best no-code AI agent platform for operators. Non-technical teams can ship real automations in hours.
Full Lindy review →Amp
What works
- Built on Sourcegraph's mature code-search and indexing infrastructure
- Free tier with meaningful usage allowance
- Strong codebase-context story without separate indexing setup
- Native integration with Sourcegraph Code Search
- Sourcegraph's enterprise compliance story (SOC 2, on-prem options) carries over
What doesn't
- Standalone value less compelling than Claude Code or Augment for non-Sourcegraph teams
- Newer to agentic coding than competitors with longer track records
- Smaller community vs Cursor or Copilot
- Locked into Sourcegraph as the indexing/context layer
- Best fit narrows to teams already paying for Sourcegraph
Lindy
What works
- Genuinely no-code — plain English agent creation
- Fast time to first value (hours, not days)
- Polished pre-built templates for sales and support
- Managed infrastructure — nothing to maintain
What doesn't
- SaaS pricing adds up at scale
- Limited customization ceiling vs open-source harnesses
- Your data lives on their servers
- Hits a ceiling on complex or non-standard workflows
Which to pick
We'd default to Lindy (4.5/5 vs 4.0/5) for most builders. Pick Amp if you fit its best-for case specifically: engineering teams already paying for sourcegraph code search who want to add an ai agent that reuses the existing codebase index. free tier is generous enough for individual evaluation.
Honest middle: most serious operators end up using more than one tool. If you're early in your AI agent journey, our five-question picker recommends a starting platform from your specific situation.
Common questions
Amp vs Lindy — which should I pick?
We rate Lindy 4.5/5 vs 4.0/5 for Amp. Lindy wins for sales and customer support teams at b2b companies who need working agents in days, not weeks, with no developer on staff. — but pick Amp if you fit its specific best-for case (Engineering teams already paying for Sourcegraph Code Search who want to add an AI agent that reuses the existing codebase index. Free tier is generous enough for individual evaluation.). See the head-to-head table above for the full breakdown.
Is Amp or Lindy cheaper?
Amp's pricing: Free tier with usage limits. Paid tiers via Sourcegraph subscription. Bundled with Sourcegraph Code Search for teams already on the platform. Lindy's pricing: Freemium. Paid plans from ~$49/month. The right "cheaper" pick depends on usage volume and what's included — see the pricing row in the table above.
What's Amp best for?
Engineering teams already paying for Sourcegraph Code Search who want to add an AI agent that reuses the existing codebase index. Free tier is generous enough for individual evaluation.
What's Lindy best for?
Sales and customer support teams at B2B companies who need working agents in days, not weeks, with no developer on staff.
Why compare Amp and Lindy if they're different categories?
Amp is a coding agent and Lindy is a no-code saas. The comparison still matters because builders evaluating one often consider the other for adjacent jobs. See the recommendation section above for how to think about the cross-category choice.
Compare Amp against other options