Compare / Amp vs Roo Code
Head-to-head
Amp vs Roo Code.
Side-by-side on ratings, pricing, pros, cons, and the honest take on which to pick. Both are in our coding agent category — direct competitors.
| Amp | Roo Code | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.0 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Category | Coding Agent | Coding Agent |
| Tech level | developer | developer |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Pricing | Free tier with usage limits. Paid tiers via Sourcegraph subscription. Bundled with Sourcegraph Code Search for teams already on the platform. | Free and open-source. BYOK — pay only for API calls to your chosen provider. No Roo Code subscription fee. |
| Best for | Engineering teams already paying for Sourcegraph Code Search who want to add an AI agent that reuses the existing codebase index. Free tier is generous enough for individual evaluation. | Developers who want Cline-style agentic coding with more structured role separation — Architect mode for planning, Code mode for implementation, Debug mode for fixing. Useful for complex tasks that benefit from keeping the AI's focus narrow. |
| Not for | Teams not on Sourcegraph — the standalone story is less differentiated than Claude Code or Augment. Builders who want a simpler CLI experience. | Non-VS Code developers — Roo Code is VS Code only. Anyone wanting a managed hosted solution rather than BYOK. |
Our verdict on Amp
Sourcegraph's agentic coding tool built on years of code-search investment. Strong for teams already on Sourcegraph; less compelling as a standalone.
Full Amp review →Our verdict on Roo Code
Free open-source VS Code agent with role-specific modes: Architect, Code, Debug, Test. Strong model flexibility. 23.7k GitHub stars. A focused Cline fork.
Full Roo Code review →Amp
What works
- Built on Sourcegraph's mature code-search and indexing infrastructure
- Free tier with meaningful usage allowance
- Strong codebase-context story without separate indexing setup
- Native integration with Sourcegraph Code Search
- Sourcegraph's enterprise compliance story (SOC 2, on-prem options) carries over
What doesn't
- Standalone value less compelling than Claude Code or Augment for non-Sourcegraph teams
- Newer to agentic coding than competitors with longer track records
- Smaller community vs Cursor or Copilot
- Locked into Sourcegraph as the indexing/context layer
- Best fit narrows to teams already paying for Sourcegraph
Roo Code
What works
- Role-specific modes (Architect, Code, Debug, Test) keep the AI focused on one job at a time
- Fully free — no subscription, just API costs
- Model-agnostic: works with Claude, GPT, Gemini, and local models
- Permission-based command approval before any command runs
- Open source — transparent about what it's doing and why
What doesn't
- VS Code only — no JetBrains, no CLI-first workflow
- Smaller community than Cline (23.7k vs 61k stars)
- Mode switching adds cognitive overhead for simple tasks — sometimes you just want to ask and get an answer
- Less enterprise support infrastructure than Cursor or Cline
Which to pick
These two are closely matched. Don't pick on overall rating — pick on use case. Amp for engineering teams already paying for sourcegraph code search who want to add an ai agent that reuses the existing codebase index. free tier is generous enough for individual evaluation. Roo Code for developers who want cline-style agentic coding with more structured role separation — architect mode for planning, code mode for implementation, debug mode for fixing. useful for complex tasks that benefit from keeping the ai's focus narrow.
Honest middle: most serious operators end up using more than one tool. If you're early in your AI agent journey, our five-question picker recommends a starting platform from your specific situation.
Common questions
Amp vs Roo Code — which should I pick?
Amp and Roo Code are closely matched (we rate them 4.0/5 and 4.0/5). Pick by use case rather than overall score: Amp for engineering teams already paying for sourcegraph code search who want to add an ai agent that reuses the existing codebase index. free tier is generous enough for individual evaluation.; Roo Code for developers who want cline-style agentic coding with more structured role separation — architect mode for planning, code mode for implementation, debug mode for fixing. useful for complex tasks that benefit from keeping the ai's focus narrow..
Is Amp or Roo Code cheaper?
Amp's pricing: Free tier with usage limits. Paid tiers via Sourcegraph subscription. Bundled with Sourcegraph Code Search for teams already on the platform. Roo Code's pricing: Free and open-source. BYOK — pay only for API calls to your chosen provider. No Roo Code subscription fee. The right "cheaper" pick depends on usage volume and what's included — see the pricing row in the table above.
What's Amp best for?
Engineering teams already paying for Sourcegraph Code Search who want to add an AI agent that reuses the existing codebase index. Free tier is generous enough for individual evaluation.
What's Roo Code best for?
Developers who want Cline-style agentic coding with more structured role separation — Architect mode for planning, Code mode for implementation, Debug mode for fixing. Useful for complex tasks that benefit from keeping the AI's focus narrow.
Are Amp and Roo Code direct competitors?
Yes — both are coding agent options. They target similar builders, which is why the head-to-head matters.
Compare Amp against other options