Coding Agent

Cursor

Name: Cursor Review — Agent Shortlist
Item: Cursor
Rating: 4.0
Author: Agent Shortlist

The AI-first IDE that 360k developers pay for

4.0 / 5DeveloperHobby (free): 2k completions/month, 50 slow requests/month

Our verdict

The most-used AI coding IDE — $2B revenue, 360k paying users. Multi-model flexibility is a real edge. June 2025 pricing changes burned early adopters.

Best for

Builders who want an IDE-first AI experience and the ability to switch between Claude, GPT, and Gemini mid-session. Strong for rapid prototyping and exploration.

Not for

Teams committed to JetBrains, Vim, or any non-VS Code editor. Anyone who wants CLI-first workflows. Operators sensitive to SaaS pricing changes.

Overview

Cursor is a VS Code fork with AI baked into the editor. The headline is multi-model: Claude Sonnet 4.6, GPT-5, and Gemini 2.0 are all available, and you can switch between them mid-session for the same task. That flexibility is the real differentiator — Claude Code only runs Claude, Codex only runs OpenAI. The IDE-first approach is faster than CLI workflows for exploration and rapid prototyping. The trade-off is VS Code lock-in: no JetBrains, no Vim, no terminal-first workflows. The June 2025 pricing pivot replaced fixed fast-request quotas with a $20 credit pool, which effectively cut monthly requests by ~55% without an announcement. Existing users felt blindsided. Despite that, Cursor still hit $2B annualised revenue by early 2026 — the market has voted.

What works

+Multi-model — switch between Claude, GPT, and Gemini in the same session
+Familiar VS Code experience reduces onboarding friction
+Largest paying customer base on this list (360k)
+Best for rapid prototyping and exploration
+Active product development — feature velocity is high

What doesn't

−VS Code lock-in — no JetBrains, no Vim, no terminal-first workflows
−June 2025 pricing pivot cut effective requests ~55% without warning
−Agent mode can make large unreviewable multi-file edits
−Performance lag on very large projects vs vanilla VS Code
−Opaque usage meter — hard to track credit consumption in real time

What operators use it for

Rapid Prototyping and MVPs

Cursor is the fastest tool on this list for exploration. Open a blank project, describe what you want to build, and the IDE drives the AI through inline suggestions and multi-file edits. Builders shipping MVPs report 5–10× faster time to first working prototype vs working in plain VS Code with autocomplete.

Multi-Model Comparison Mid-Session

Try Claude Sonnet 4.6 for a complex refactor. Switch to GPT-5 for a function it might handle differently. Drop down to Gemini 2.0 for a long-context task. Same conversation, three models. No other coding tool lets you do this without switching environments.

In-Line Edits While You Type

Cursor's bread and butter: AI completions that are aware of your whole codebase, not just the current file. Type the start of a function and Cursor predicts what you want to write based on patterns from across your project.

Multi-File Edits with Diff Review

Describe a refactor — 'rename this function and update all 23 call sites' — and Cursor stages the changes across files with a diff review before commit. Better safety than blind agent execution; faster than doing it manually.

Codebase Search Beyond Grep

Ask 'where do we handle authentication?' and Cursor runs a semantic search instead of a literal one. Useful when you don't know the exact function name but you know what the code does.

Onboarding to a New Codebase

Open an unfamiliar repo, ask Cursor to explain what each module does, trace how a request flows through the system. The IDE context (file tree, dependencies, imports) makes the explanations more accurate than chat-only tools.

Pricing

Hobby (free): 2k completions/month, 50 slow requests/month. Pro $20/month. Pro+ $60. Ultra $200. Teams $40/user/month. June 2025 pricing pivot reduced effective fast requests by ~55%.

Visit Cursor

Common questions about Cursor

What is Cursor AI?

Cursor is an AI-first code editor — a forked VS Code with deeply integrated AI assistance for inline edits, multi-file refactors, codebase chat, and an agent mode. It's the most-used AI coding tool by paying customers in 2026, with 360k+ paid users and $2B in annualised revenue.

How much does Cursor cost?

Hobby is free with limited completions. Pro is $20/month — the most common tier. Pro+ is $60/month, Ultra is $200/month, and Teams is $40/user/month with usage scaling. A June 2025 pricing change reduced effective fast requests by roughly 55%, so older reviews understate current costs.

Cursor vs Claude Code?

Cursor wins for IDE-first work — rapid prototyping, small targeted edits, codebase exploration. Claude Code wins for agentic loops — multi-file refactors, test-driven builds, long-running tasks. Most serious builders run both: Cursor for active development sessions, Claude Code for delegated work. Full comparison in our Claude Code vs Cursor article.

Cursor vs Windsurf?

Two IDE-first coding agents on similar shapes (both VS Code forks). Cursor has more users and faster product velocity. Windsurf has a tighter UX in places and is now owned by OpenAI (acquired mid-2024), so expect deeper OpenAI model integration over time. For most builders, Cursor remains the default; Windsurf is the credible alternative.

What models does Cursor support?

Cursor supports Claude (Opus, Sonnet, Haiku), GPT-5, Gemini, and a handful of open-source models — switchable mid-session. The multi-model flexibility is one of its strongest features for builders who benchmark across models.

Continue exploring

Tool

AI Agent Cost Calculator

See what running Cursor's typical workflow costs at your volume — pre-filled for this category.

Tool

The AI Agent Picker

Not sure Cursor is right? Five questions, one recommendation.

Article

What Claude Skills actually are

Most builders think Skills are saved prompts. The architecture is different.